<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trading the Odds on Friday – May 22, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tradingtheodds.com/2009/05/trading-the-odds-on-friday-%e2%80%93-may-22-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tradingtheodds.com/2009/05/trading-the-odds-on-friday-%e2%80%93-may-22-2009/</link>
	<description>A quantitative approach to profit in the US equity and futures markets, trading the markets like professional card counters are playing Blackjack or expert poker players are playing Poker. The key is to have the odds on your side and bet accordingly, knowing what, when, where, why and how much to bet on each trade or wager.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:40:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.tradingtheodds.com/2009/05/trading-the-odds-on-friday-%e2%80%93-may-22-2009/#comment-3860</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradingtheodds.wordpress.com/?p=1293#comment-3860</guid>
		<description>be the ball,

thanks.

In fact a &#039;buying the open&#039; approach would have had a drawdown of -1.33% (not -2.5%), because the SPY already opened lower -1.16% on the session (-2.5% was the intraday low compared to Wednesday&#039;s close).

Best,
Frank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>be the ball,</p>
<p>thanks.</p>
<p>In fact a &#8216;buying the open&#8217; approach would have had a drawdown of -1.33% (not -2.5%), because the SPY already opened lower -1.16% on the session (-2.5% was the intraday low compared to Wednesday&#8217;s close).</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Frank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: be the ball</title>
		<link>http://www.tradingtheodds.com/2009/05/trading-the-odds-on-friday-%e2%80%93-may-22-2009/#comment-3861</link>
		<dc:creator>be the ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradingtheodds.wordpress.com/?p=1293#comment-3861</guid>
		<description>Absolutely love your blog and factor your stats into my trading most days.

&quot;so a potential ‘buy the open’ approach would have ended with a loss of -0.28% (only) for the SPY.&quot; Not sure who would have let the position go 2.5% against them intraday to close with that small loss, but regardless, you are correct...

I &quot;ignored&quot; Thursdays conclusions in my decision making today because I noticed that your first conclusion has no occurrences during this bear market. I found that noteworthy. I apologize for not posting this thought last night when it could have helped....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely love your blog and factor your stats into my trading most days.</p>
<p>&#8220;so a potential ‘buy the open’ approach would have ended with a loss of -0.28% (only) for the SPY.&#8221; Not sure who would have let the position go 2.5% against them intraday to close with that small loss, but regardless, you are correct&#8230;</p>
<p>I &#8220;ignored&#8221; Thursdays conclusions in my decision making today because I noticed that your first conclusion has no occurrences during this bear market. I found that noteworthy. I apologize for not posting this thought last night when it could have helped&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

