Icon

TRADING THE ODDS

Icon

A quantitative approach to profit in the US equity and futures markets, trading the markets like professional card counters are playing Blackjack or expert poker players are playing Poker. The key is to have the odds on your side and bet accordingly, knowing what, when, where, why and how much you bet on each trade or wager.


By proceeding beyond this point and/or using the information presented on this site(s) the reader is deemed to have read, understood and fully and without reservation accepted the terms and conditions laid down in the Disclaimer. The information, analysis and commentary on this site is provided for statistical and informational purposes only. Nothing herein should be interpreted or regarded as personalized investment advice or to state or imply that past results are an indication of future performance. The author of this website is not a licensed financial advisor and will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to, any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on the content of this website(s). Under no circumstances does this information represent a recommendation or advice to buy, sell or hold any security.
( Data courtesy of MetaStock http://www.equis.com/ )

Update: How To Make A Million (%) Trading The SPYDER

This is an update to my previous posting How To Make A Million (%) Trading The SPYDER – Part I.

By streamlining a couple of conditions and the respective set of parameters as well as utilizing Bollinger Bands for identifying areas of short-term mean reversion tendencies, I was able to increase cumulative returns 10-fold (22,’3 mio. % since 01/01/1990) and to achieve a compounded annual growth rate of 85.13%, while maximum drawdown and the respective maximum number of sessions in a drawdown were cut in half (with respect to the long side of the strategy, now 8.86% only during a 20-year time frame).

But although the model is not ‘adaptive‘ (no additions/changes/cancellations/modifications to conditions, parameters and/or dependencies based on the then current market environment), and although with respect to out-of-sample or walk-forward testing the odds of selecting something which was all by chance (and purely random) decreases exponentially as one uses a larger test set (in this case more than 5,000 data points/trading days), and although the model shows a t-score in excess of 1.645 in almost all of the last 20 years (means there is a low probability that the model’s out-performance in comparison to the general market occured by chance only), there is still the risk of overfitting which will be my major concern and challenge for the next couple of weeks (taking some complexity out of the model).

Table I below shows the (updated) SPY‘s (S&P 500 ETF) performance (cumulative returns) since 01/01/1990. Setup 2 represents the long side (long trades only) of the strategy, setup 3 represents the short side (short trades only) of the strategy, and setup 1 the overall stratgey as a combination of long and short trades.

All initial basic parameters are still in place (leaving room for improvement and optimization at a later stage), and the model is still not optimized on the short side, which means a short trade is always triggered if no buy setup is triggered although it might be wise to take no position at all (instead of going short) if no edge is provided on any side of the market:

  • For backtesting the SPY (SPDR S&P 500 ETF) will be utilized (adjusted for dividend and cash payments in order to track the S&P 500 as close as possible) which corresponds generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the S&P 500 Index.
  • Positions will be entered into or an open position closed at the market’s regular close only (market-on-close orders).
  • No (intraday) stops (buy and/or sell stops) will be used even if the SPY (S&P 500 EFF) is being utilized.
  • No position sizing, the model is always ‘all in‘ (e.g. no Kelly, optimal f, fixed fraction, …).
  • No leverage taken (no double or triple-leveraged ETFs are used).
  • No abnormal market filter will be used (e.g. during phases of extremly high/low volatility, strong trending markets, the market’s lacking compliance to the model’s forecasts with a resultant number of consecutive losses and/or serious drawdown, and and and)
  • No adaptations (no changes and/or cancellations/additions of formulas, conditions, and model parameters over the course of the lifetime of the model/during backtesting).
  • The model (and respective performance figures) does not account for slippage, transactions costs (commissions, exchange and regulatory fees), and interest on idle balances.


Year by year performance stats can be found here (1990 – 1999) and here (2000 – 2009). Please click on ‘View full size‘ on the top right of the picture(s).

Figure I below shows the respective equity curve (setup 1 as the combination of long and short trades, setup 2 -longs only- and setup 3 -shorts only-) from 01/01/1990 to 12/31/1999.

Figure II below shows the respective equity curve (setup 2 -longs only- in blue, and setup 3 -shorts only- in red) from 01/01/2000 to 12/31/2007.

Figure III below shows the respective equity curve (setup 2 -longs only- in blue, and setup 3 -shorts only- in red) from 01/01/2008 to 12/28/2009.

For those interested in, the model’s signals will be posted from January 4, 2010 (next Monday) onward regularly shortly before the close (but even if posted shortly after the close, the SPY is still availabe for trading with good liquidity and narrow spreads of regularly $0.01) via Twitter Update by following a new Twitter account @Strategy_I . (making further improvements to the model – e.g. optimization of the short side and reducing the chance of overfitting – as well as introducing position sizing, leverage, abnormal market filters, implementing buy/sell stops and probably making the model ‘adaptive‘ will be an ongoing process in 2010)

But please be reminded that past performance is never an indication (leave alone a guarantee) for future performance, and for good reason the CFTA and NFA (COMPLIANCE RULE 2-29: USE OF PROMOTIONAL MATERIAL CONTAINING HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS) requires all members (which I’m not) to explicitely reference to limitations, risks, lack of liquidity, among others, and publish a respective disclaimer.

Successful trading,
Frank

________________________________

If you might want to be instantly notified about what’s happening in the markets and at TRADING THE ODDS, I encourage you to subscribe to my RSS Feed or Email Feed, and (or) follow me on Twitter.

xx

Disclaimer: No position in the securities mentioned in this post at time of writing.

The information on this site is provided for statistical and informational purposes only. Nothing herein should be interpreted or regarded as personalized investment advice or to state or imply that past results are an indication of future performance. The author of this website is not a licensed financial advisor and will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to, any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on the content of this website(s). Under no circumstances does this information represent an advice or recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security.

Add to Technorati Favorites

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly (Sessions of the Year)

Due to the fact that tomorrow (Thursday) will be the last session of the year, and (as promised) in order to prepare for the next posting about developing a ‘market model‘ (financial trading strategy) dealing with those ‘Seasonalities‘, I thought you (my readers) might be interested in what – from a historical and statistical perspective – were (better : ‘are’) the most (un-)favorable sessions (as the consecutive number of the respective business day) of the year.

Table I below shows the SPX‘s (S&P 500) top 100 sessions (since 01/01/1940) for going long on the close, and the respective Cumulative Returns, Profit Factor and Win/Loss Ratio if one would’ve sold on close of the then following session, ordered by [1] Cumulative Returns,  [2] Profit Factor, [3] Win/Loss Ratio. (Example: The most favorable session – with respect to Cumulative Returns – for buying on the close and selling on close of the then following session would’ve been the first business day of the year).

Table II below shows the SPX‘s (S&P 500) most unfavorable 100 sessions (since 01/01/1940) for going long on the close, and the respective Cumulative Returns, Profit Factor and Win/Loss Ratio if one would’ve sold on close of the then following session, ordered by [1] Cumulative Returns,  [2] Profit Factor, [3] Win/Loss Ratio. (Example: The most unfavorable session for buying on the close and selling on close of the then following session would’ve been the 201st business day of the year).

Interestingly 8 out of the top 13 most favorable, and 5 out of the bottom 13 most unfavorable sessions for going long on the close can be found in the last quarter of the year (consecutive number of the respective business day greater than 200), not surprisingly a major part during the month of October (increased volatility).

Table III shows the SPX‘s (S&P 500) performance (since 01/01/1940) going long on the close two business days before the New Year exchange holiday (Setup 1, would be triggered today), going long on close of the business day immediately preceding the New Year exchange holiday (Setup 2), and going long on close of the business day immediately following the New Year exchange holiday (Setup 3, the first session of the new year and historically the most favorable session of the year for going long on the close).

It seems that on the first business day(s) of the year, a lot of people seem to be eager to put year end bonuses, christmas presents and and and into the markets, reflected by a winning percentage in excess of 70%, a profit factor greater than 3, two maximum consecutive losses (out of 68 occurrences) and a tiny drawdown of 3.83%.

In either case one of those ‘Seasonalities‘, where historical occurrences and respective probabilities and odds advise to be positioned on the long side of the market instead of going against all odds, although (and unfortunately) past performance is never a guarantee for future performance.

I wish you a Happy New Year.

Best,

Frank

________________________________

If you might want to be instantly notified about what’s happening in the markets and at TRADING THE ODDS, I encourage you to subscribe to my RSS Feed or Email Feed, and (or) follow me on Twitter.

xx

Disclaimer: No position in the securities mentioned in this post at time of writing.

The information on this site is provided for statistical and informational purposes only. Nothing herein should be interpreted or regarded as personalized investment advice or to state or imply that past results are an indication of future performance. The author of this website is not a licensed financial advisor and will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to, any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on the content of this website(s). Under no circumstances does this information represent an advice or recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security.

Add to Technorati Favorites

BLOGROLL

Twitter Feed

     SPY (S&P 500 SPDR.)

DISCLAIMER

The information on this site is provided for statistical and informational purposes only. Nothing herein should be interpreted or regarded as personalized investment advice or to state or imply that past results are an indication of future performance. Under no circumstances does this information represent an advice or recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security.

The author of this website is not a licensed financial advisor and will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to, any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on the content of this website, including the information that others post here.

While every effort will be made to provide complete, the most accurate and current information, none of the information on this site is guaranteed to be correct, and anything written here should be subject to independent verification. I make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to this blog or the information, analysis, statistics, or related graphics contained on the blog for any purpose.

I may or may not hold positions for myself, my family and/or clients in the securities mentioned here. Actions may have been taken before or after information is presented, and any opinions expressed in this site are subject to change without notice.

Please read the full ... DISCLAIMER

Archives