Daily Commentary - Posted on Saturday, October 16, 2010, 11:15 PM GMT +1

5 Comments


Oct Saturday 16

The Infinite Improbability Drive

It seems as if major market indices are currently powered by the famous Infinite Improbability Drive (the Heart of Gold in Douglas Adam’s ‘The Hitchhiker’s Guide To The Galaxy‘ novels); the improbable odds against closing higher (on a session with mostly disastrous market internals) being two raised to the power of the Islington (London) flat phone number (2079460347) where Arthur had met Tricia McMillan.

Besides the fact that NYSE Adv./Decl. Volume closed at 0.5325, and S&P 500 Adv./Decl. Volume closed at 0.4553 (volume in declining stocks more than doubled volume in advancing stocks), it was especially the (significantly lopsided) negative NYSE TICK data which caught my eye. A TICK is the number of NYSE stocks traded on an uptick vs. (minus) stocks traded on a downtick ; extreme TICK readings (e.g. < -1,000 and/or > +1,000) often indicate the presence of institutional buy or sell programs or heavy short covering on extreme positive readings.

Table I below shows NYSE TICK statistics for the session on Friday, October 15, 2010, divided into the total number of 1-minute lows below -1,000 , -750 , -500 and 1-minute highs above +1,000, +750, +500, during the first hour, during the main session (from the end of the first hour until the start of the last hour) and during the last hour of the session.

xx

NYSE TICK # 1-min Lows # 1-min Highs
Time of Day -1,000 – 750 – 500 ≥ +1,000 ≥ + 750 ≥ + 500
First Hour 7 19 32 0 0 1
Main Session 11 35 67 3 16 49
Last Hour 0 2 19 0 1 14

xx

You might notice at first glance that the total number of 1-minute lows always exceeded the respective total number of 1-minute highs during every part of the session (first hour, main part and last hour), e.g. 11 1-minute lows below -1,000 vs 3 1-minute highs during the main session, and there was not a single reading above +750 during the first hour of the session (in contrast to 7 1-minute lows below -1,000, reflecting heavy selling pressure right after the start of Friday’s session).

Table II below shows the regular outcome of those sessions where market internals – in this event NYSE TICK data – where heavily skewed (on the negative side), means where the total number of 1-minute lows always exceeded the respective total number of 1-minute highs during every part of the session (first hour, main part and last hour) in the past (listed are the last 79 occurrences and the SPY‘s historical performance over the course of the then following 1, 2 , 3 , 4 and 5 sessions, assumed one went long on close the day before).


(* the SPY closed higher despite negative NYSE TICK data)

Out of 132 occurrences since 2000, the SPY closed higher on (only) 8 (as of Friday, October 15) and lower on 124 occurrences, with a median trade of -2.07% (!!). In addition, the SPY closed on a lower level 3 sessions later (in this event Tuesday, October 19, assumed one went long on Thursday, October 14) on 4 out of every 5 occurrences (or 81.92% of the time).

But what happened on those occurrences where the SPY defied all probabilities and odds (means despite negative NYSE TICK data) and closed higher in the past ?

Table III below shows those occurrences and the SPY‘s historical performance over the course of the then following 1, 2 , 3 , 4 and 5 sessions, assumed one went long on close of a session where the total number of 1-minute lows always exceeded the respective total number of 1-minute highs during every part of the session (first hour, main part and last hour) in the past, and the SPY did not loose more than -0.50% on the same day (in order to increase the sample size, and bearing in mind that the DOW lost -0.40% on Friday’s session).


(* no close below trigger day’s close during next 5 sessions)

Especially noteworthy are the following pattern:

  • the SPY closed on a lower level at least once over the course of the then following 5 sessions on all of those up to now 13 occurrences,
  • the SPY closed on a lower level latest 3 sessions later on all of those 13 occurrences,
  • the SPY was trading higher at least 1.0% or more 3 sessions later on 2, but lower at least -1.0% on 7 occurrences, and finally
  • (not listed) the SPY was trading higher 2 and 3 weeks later on only 1 out of every 4 occurrences (or 23.08% of the time).

Conclusions:

I history gives guidance, sellers will probably show up again early next week, and probabilities and odds are heavily tilt in favor of at least one lower close below Friday’s (October 15, 2010) close latest on Wednesday, October 20.

Successful trading,

Frank

Disclosure: Long SPXU (ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500) at time of writing.

________________________________

If you might want to be instantly notified about what’s happening in the markets and at TRADING THE ODDS, I encourage you to subscribe to my RSS Feed or Email Feed, and (or) follow me on Twitter.

________________________________

Remarks: Due to their conceptual scope – and if not explicitely stated otherwise – , all models/setups/strategies do not account for slippage, fees and transaction costs, do not account for return on cash and/or interest on margin, do not use position sizing (e.g. Kelly, optimal f) – they’re always ‘all in‘ – , do not use leverage (e.g. leveraged ETFs), do not utilize any kind of abnormal market filter (e.g. during market phases with extremely elevated volatility), do not use intraday buy/sell stops (end-of-day prices only), and models/setups/strategies are not ‘adaptive‘ (do not adjust to the ongoing changes in market conditions like bull and bear markets).

________________________________

Disclaimer

The information on this site is provided for statistical and informational purposes only. Nothing herein should be interpreted or regarded as personalized investment advice or to state or imply that past results are an indication of future performance. The author of this website is not a licensed financial advisor and will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to, any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on the content of this website(s). Under no circumstances does this information represent an advice or recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security.

I may or may not hold positions for myself, my family and/or clients in the securities mentioned here. Actions may have been taken before or after information is presented, and any opinions expressed in this site are subject to change without notice.

(Data courtesy of MetaStock , and for data import, testing, surveys and statistics I use MATLAB from MathWorks)

________________________________

Comments (5)

 

  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Frank Hogelucht, Danielle Potts. Danielle Potts said: RT @TradingTheOdds – New blog post: The Infinite Improbability Drive URL: http://bit.ly/cDc0Ev ($$ $SPX $ES_F $NDX $NQ_F) […]

  2. Predator says:

    Hi Frank,

    Impressive work… but POMO will be >=9 at least until nov15th…do you think today´s post will prevail over POMO?

    • TradingTheOdds says:

      Predator,

      at first we’re talking about a probably lower close until next Wednesday (latest). Even with 9 POMO days within a 20-day time frame, the market never went straight up.

      And the problem with POMO days is that they will change their nature and will be a regular event for the time being (see http://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/opolicy/operating_policy_100810.html). The market will probably not go up forever …

      With respect to a higher/lower close 1 and 2 month later, we’ve at least 2 concurring signals now (unfortunately this happens more frequent than desired), but the market up year-to-date at the end of September, 5 consecutive higher readings in the MarketVane survey (among others) imply a positive trend over the reminder of the year. Let’s see what other signals wll be provided over the course of the next couple of day/weeks …

      Best,
      Frank

  3. vimal says:

    Hi Frank. This study is very interesting (The infinite improbability drive). Is this possible to rerun to see how its performed over the past few months and additional POMO? Would be really appreciated if you can post this

    Regards

    Vimal

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *